【東京】靖国神社宮司の小堀氏が退任へ･･･6月の会議で「陛下は靖国を潰そうとしている」と不穏当発言 週刊誌報道　宮内庁に謝罪★3

556 ：名無しさん＠１周年：2018/10/11(木) 02:18:07.03 ID:zZoeJ37D0.net

>>554

バークの基本的思想は正しき神が自然法を与え、神の法である自然法から権利を派生させる遠回しな定義をする
英国国教会とそのカテキズムを無視して人権を勝手に解釈し資産・爵位・教会の権利等を破壊しよう
とする平等を強引に推し進めることを厳しく批判した

Far am I from denying in theory, full as far is my heart from withholding
in practice (if I were of power to give or to withhold) the real
rights of men. In denying their false claims of right, I do not mean to
injure those which are real, and are such as their pretended rights would
totally destroy. If civil society be made for the advantage of man, all the
advantages for which it is made become his right. It is an institution of
beneficence; and law itself is only beneficence acting by a rule. Men
have a right to live by that rule; they have a right to do justice, as between
their fellows, whether their fellows are in public function or in
ordinary occupation. They have a right to the fruits of their industry and
to the means of making their industry fruitful.
---Edmund Burke

バークが言う慈善は言うまでもなくキリスト教における道徳を指し、このキリスト教的精神である慈善の行使が法律であると断定する
つまり慈善に従わないものは法律から外れているのだから、キリスト教の慈善と道徳に従わない権利は存在しないとみなす

この理屈はバークが継承したマグナ・カルタ、ワット・タイラーの乱、名誉革命などの抵抗する権利を正当化している

Burke and Natural Rights
Edmund Burke was at once a chief exponent of the Ciceronian doctrine of natural law and
a chief opponent of the “rights of man.” In our time, which is experiencing simultaneously
a revival of interest in natural-law theory and an enthusiasm for defining “human rights”
that is exemplified by the United Nations' lengthy declaration, Burke's view of the natural
juridic order deserves close attention.

Unlike Bolingbroke and Hume, whose outward politics in some respects resembled the great
Whig statesman's, Burke was a pious man. “The most important questions about the human
race Burke answered … from the Church of England's catechism.” He takes for granted a
Christian cosmos, in which a just God has established moral principles for man's salvation.
God has given man law, and with that law, rights; such, succinctly, is Burke's premise in all
moral and juridical questions.

A theological defence of Burkean conservatism and a critique of contractarian liberalism
https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:9a3edb44-5ad3-462c-a0c0-268f933b3df1

Secondly, I have analysed the theological content of Burke's political thought, demonstrating that
Burke's political thought emerged from his Christian faith and his concomitant belief in the natural law.
I have argued that, as a result, there is a profound consonance between the central principles of the
Christian faith and the conservative tradition which followed Burke.

日本の保守主義が初動の段階から亜流となったのは、キリスト教が無いからであり、バークの保守主義を理解・成立しうる
文化的土壌が欠けているからだ。福沢諭吉は天という言葉を使ったが、これをキリスト教と正反対の儒教倫理で代用しても極端な腐敗や
閉塞した社会の停滞を防ぐことはできなかった

キリスト教がない保守主義からの民主主義は慈善にかけ、民主主義は縁故選民主義、利己主義、拝金主義に収束した偽民主主義と化す

バークを一旦スクラップして、新たな価値基準・思想を一から作るか、キリスト教を導入するでもしない限り
本家から著しく劣化した偽保守主義になることは自明だ