Suffering from dirty strong supersonic attacks

24 ：YAMAGUTIseisei：2019/04/24(水) 10:00:46.70 ID:5ZbN1Z79Q ?2BP(3)

(a) (b) (c) (d)


Fig.5:
Demonstration of raw SSVEP responses for the predictive model, RF poly2.
The bottom row shows a comparison of actual (SSVEP inputs) and predicted signals.
Leave-one-person-out cross validation (one out of ten) is used to evaluate the model in Figure 5 (a)-(d) are examples of the actual and predicted signals from experimental cond.1, cond.2, cond.3, and cond.4, respectively.

(a) (b)


Fig.6:
The means of average speed and deviations of the box in varying window lengths from one to five seconds, (a) is the increasing speed period and (b) is the decreasing speed period.


TABLE II:
Comparison of the conventional and proposed measures for SSVEP-BCIs in maintaining a box on the moving robotic.
There are three measures: the average speed from a robotic simulator (bold is higher), deviation of the box in increasing periods (bold is lower), and decreasing periods (bold is lower).
*Denotes that the number is significantly lower than the others, p<0.01..